Re: [RFC patch 15/15] LTTng timestamp x86

[Christoph Lameter]

Luck, Tony wrote:
> Even one line bouncing between cpus can be a performamce disaster.
> You'll probably hit a serious wall somewhere between 8 and 16
> cpus (ia64 has code that looks a lot like this in the gettimeofday()
> path because it does not synchronize cpu cycle counters ... some


The code exist by necessity because some systems do not have synchronized ITCs
and one would not have time go backward. The cmpxchg there is usually switched
off. Its horrible in terms of scaling to large numbers of processor and also
horrible in terms of clock accuracy.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/