Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]: Fix Xen domU boot with batched mprotect

[Jan Beulich]

>>> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> 17.10.08 17:19 >>>
>Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> 16.10.08 18:10 >>>
>>>>>         
>>> The current x86-64 implementation is:
>>>
>>> bool __virt_addr_valid(unsigned long x)
>>> {
>>> 	if (x >= __START_KERNEL_map) {
>>> 		x -= __START_KERNEL_map;
>>> 		if (x >= KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE)
>>> 			return false;
>>>     
>>
>> This, imo, is still broken (i.e. the name of the function still isn't matched
>> by the implementation): KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE is a constant and doesn't
>> account for the fact that only the real kernel image can be relied upon
>> to be mapped.
>>   
>
>Perhaps, but I don't think it matters too much.  Unless you have a tiny 
>amount of physical memory, locations in the kernel mapping beyond the 
>actual kernel will still resolve to proper locations in the linear map.

Is e.g. 256Mb tiny? KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE these days is 512Mb... Indeed,
when it was 40Mb (up until a few releases ago), this indeed wouldn't
matter.

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/