Re: [patch] gpiolib: fix oops in gpio_get_value_cansleep()

[Anton Vorontsov]

On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:06:21AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Thursday 16 October 2008, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > > -     return chip->get(chip, gpio - chip->base);
> > > +     return chip->get ? chip->get(chip, gpio - chip->base) : 0;
> > 
> > Why don't we check the .set in the gpio_set_value? Because
> > we must always call gpio_direction_output()?
> 
> Yes.  The output driver needs to be explicitly enabled,
> to avoid misbehaving electic circuitry.
> 
> 
> > It is not exactly the 
> > same we work with the input direction.. is this documented anywhere?
> 
> In Documentation/gpio.txt since the very first versions.
> 
> See the section on "Spinlock-Safe GPIO access", where
> special cases for reading the value of output GPIOs are
> desribed.  Other aspects are mentioned in other spots.
> 
> For example, open drain signals -- as used with I2C and
> other protocols -- only drive the "low" signal level,
> and if code wants a "high" level it's got to verify that
> nobody else is driving that shared line to low.  By
> reading it back, even though it's configured as output.

I see. Much thanks for the explanations.

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/