Re: [RFC] Kernel version numbering scheme change

[david]

On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:

> On 16.10.2008 02:25, Greg KH wrote:
> > You brought this topic up a few months ago, and passed it off as
> > something we would discuss at the kernel summit.  But that never
> > happened, so I figured I'd bring it up again here.
> >
> > So, as someone who constantly is dealing with kernel version numbers all
> > the time with the -stable trees, our current numbering scheme is a pain
> > a times.  How about this proposal instead?
> >
> > We number the kernel based on the year, and the numbers of releases we
> > have done this year:
> > 	YEAR.NUMBER.MINOR_RELEASE
> >
> > For example, the first release in 2009 would be called:
> > 	2009.0.0
> > The second:
> > 	2009.1.0
> > [...]
>
> That afaics has one minor downside: You don't know in advance how the next 
> kernel is going to be called. Example: the kernel that is currently developed 
> could become 2008.4 (the fifth kernel in 2008) if this development cycle in 
> the end is one of the quicker ones and gets finished this year. But if 
> everything is a bit slower then it might become 2009.0 (the first one in 
> 2009).
>
> Hence people that write a lot of articles about things that happen in linux 
> land (like LWN.net or I do) would be forced to write sentences like "[...]the 
> kernel that will become 2008.3 or 2009.0 will have feature foo that works 
> like this[...]". That will get really confusing if you read those articles 
> half a year later -- especially if that kernel became 2008.3 in the end, 
> because foo in 2009.0 might already look quite different again...

pick a name when the merge window opens

either based on when the merge window opens, or when it's expected to be 
released (and accept that you may have a 2008.3 released in early 2009, or 
a 2009.1 released in december 2008)

David Lang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/