Re: acpi-test tree on eeepc: EC error message on second resume

[Alexey Starikovskiy]

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > No, we discussed this before -- we are outside of the transaction, thus 
> > no GPE
> > activity could interfere with ec_check_ibf0.
>
> Ok, this is in the process context and we don't really expect to get an
> interrupt at this point, but what happens if the EC generates an event that's
> not related to any transiaction.  Is that guaranteed to never happen?
Interrupt handler in this case can't cause a change to status register, thus our 
read of it will not be affected by interrupt.
> Thanks,
> Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/