Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Track in-kernel when we expect checkpoint/restartto work

[Daniel Lezcano]

Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 18:34 +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > This flag is weak... testing it gives absolutly no hint whether the
> > checkpoint may succeed or not. As it is designed now, a user can only be
> > aware that checkpoint is *forever* denied. I agree that it's only useful
> > as a "flexible CR todo list".
>
> Cool, so everyone agrees the patch is useful!

Yes, definitively. It is a good idea.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/