Re: cgroup task groups appears sensitive to absolute magnitude ofshares

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 17:00 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:

> Going to 4000/2000/1000/200 doesn't seem to give noticeable 
> improvements, and going to 40000/20000/10000/2000 causes the test to 
> behave unpredictably, either taking abnormally long to complete or else 
> not completing at all.

Hmm, I would have expected it to work for at least the normal nice range
of weight values..

Will have to look into that I suppose..

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/