Re: [PATCH 3/4] xtensa: Change unaligned access to use packedstruct implementation

[Harvey Harrison]

On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 22:16 -0700, Chris Zankel wrote:
> Hi Harvey,
> 
> Please allow me a couple of days to look into it. I don't know the 
> historic reasons why the memmove variant was chosen.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Chris
> 

Sure, from the comments in the original version, it looks like it was done
this way to avoid __builtin_memcpy from being generated.  But maybe there was another
reason?

Harvey



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/