Re: [PATCH] markers: remove 2 exported symbols

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* Lai Jiangshan (laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> 
> __mark_empty_function() and marker_probe_cb_noarg()
> should not be seen by outer code. this patch remove them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff --git a/include/linux/marker.h b/include/linux/marker.h
> index 1290653..f4d4d28 100644
> --- a/include/linux/marker.h
> +++ b/include/linux/marker.h
> @@ -132,12 +132,8 @@ static inline void __printf(1, 2) ___mark_check_format(const char *fmt, ...)
>  			___mark_check_format(format, ## args);		\
>  	} while (0)
>  
> -extern marker_probe_func __mark_empty_function;
> -

Hi Lai,

Hrm ? Have a good look at the macro __trace_mark() in
include/linux/marker.h, you'll see that __mark_empty_function is
referenced. Have you tested this against code with declared markers ?

>  extern void marker_probe_cb(const struct marker *mdata,
>  	void *call_private, ...);
> -extern void marker_probe_cb_noarg(const struct marker *mdata,
> -	void *call_private, ...);

This second change is correct. marker_probe_cb is referenced by
__trace_mark(), but not marker_probe_cb_noarg, which is only connected
when non-empty format string is found by the registration function in
marker.c.

>  
>  /*
>   * Connect a probe to a marker.
> diff --git a/kernel/marker.c b/kernel/marker.c
> index 7d1faec..4440a09 100644
> --- a/kernel/marker.c
> +++ b/kernel/marker.c
> @@ -81,11 +81,10 @@ static struct hlist_head marker_table[MARKER_TABLE_SIZE];
>   * though the function pointer change and the marker enabling are two distinct
>   * operations that modifies the execution flow of preemptible code.
>   */
> -void __mark_empty_function(void *probe_private, void *call_private,
> +static void __mark_empty_function(void *probe_private, void *call_private,
>  	const char *fmt, va_list *args)
>  {
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__mark_empty_function);
>  

Same as comment above.

>  /*
>   * marker_probe_cb Callback that prepares the variable argument list for probes.
> @@ -157,7 +156,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(marker_probe_cb);
>   *
>   * Should be connected to markers "MARK_NOARGS".
>   */
> -void marker_probe_cb_noarg(const struct marker *mdata, void *call_private, ...)
> +static void marker_probe_cb_noarg(const struct marker *mdata, void *call_private, ...)
>  {
>  	va_list args;	/* not initialized */
>  	char ptype;
> @@ -197,7 +196,6 @@ void marker_probe_cb_noarg(const struct marker *mdata, void *call_private, ...)
>  	}
>  	preempt_enable();
>  }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(marker_probe_cb_noarg);
>  

This one is ok.

So overall, if you could check why you have not hit any problem when
removing __mark_empty_function, that would be great. The only reason I
see is that you had no markers in your kernel test code.

Mathieu

>  static void free_old_closure(struct rcu_head *head)
>  {
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/