Re: IRQ balancing on a router

From: Nick Piggin
Date: Tue Oct 07 2008 - 11:00:27 EST


On Tuesday 07 October 2008 21:29, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 06:38 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > The good news is that irqthreads at least have the potential to solve
> > this "lack of information"; if not, we could consider doing a form of
> > microaccounting for irq handlers....
>
> I have some patches floating about that account for nmi/irq/softirq time
> in a fine grained scale. The trouble is that i've so far not found a way
> to handle the case of a jiffie based sched_clock().

Would be nice to have.


> The trouble with that is that time always increases in IRQ context, so
> nmi=0, softirq=0, regular=0 but irq=100%, which is obviuosly
> sub-optimal :-)

Can't you exempt the timer interrupt from counting itself as irq
in the case of timer interrupt based sched_clock()?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/