Re: <PING> Re: [patch x86/core] x86: allow number of additionalhotplug CPUs to be set at compile time

[Ingo Molnar]

* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > and no way can any of this go into v2.6.27: this is fragile code 
> > with a lot of historic baggage and the original error is non-fatal 
> > to begin with. It can easily be backported to .27.1 if testing shows 
> > that it has no other adverse side-effects.
> 
> Please lets get rid of all this.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	tglx
> ---------------->
> >From 344707c1f43dd0d080828497aacb60c0cc0a8c13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 17:27:56 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] x86, smpboot: remove additional_cpus
> 
> remove remainder of additional_cpus logic. We now just listen to the
> disabled_cpus value like we did for years. disabled_cpus is always >=
> 0 so no need for an extra check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

applied to tip/x86/core - thanks Thomas!

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/