Re: [PATCH] ftrace: Add a C-state tracer to help poweroptimization

From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Sat Oct 04 2008 - 13:15:30 EST



On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

> On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:32:51 -0400 (EDT)
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > +struct trace_cstate {
> > > + struct trace_entry ent;
> > > + struct cstate_trace state_data;
> > > +};
> > > +
> >
> > Can you please register this in the trace_assign_type macro.
> >
> > IF_ASSIGN(var, ent, struct trace_cstate, TRACE_BOOT); \
>
> I don't see this anywhere in the kernel ;(
>
> > And here, do not typecast. Use the trace_assign_type macro below.
>
> nor that guy

The two should be in linux-tip. If you are based against mainline, then
no they will not be.

If you are already using linux-tip, try refreshing.


>
>
> >
> > > + struct cstate_trace *it = &field->state_data;
> > > + struct trace_seq *s = &iter->seq;
> > > + struct timespec stamp = ktime_to_timespec(it->stamp);
> >
> > Also note that iter->ts holds a timestamp counter from bootup in
> > nanosecs. It currently uses the sched_clock to record, but may change
> > later to something a bit better.
>
> given that some of these clocks stop during idle... I really do care
> about which timestamp is used, tracing idle with a clock that stops
> during idle won't work too well.
>

OK, I just wanted to let you know about it.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/