Re: [PATCH 01/31] cpumask: Documentation

[Ingo Molnar]

* Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Absolutely!  I may have my own concerns and preferences but the end 
> goal is far more important.  I'll take a look at it today.  [My only 
> other pressing matter is convincing Ingo to accept the SCIR driver (or 
> tell me how I need to change it so it is acceptable), so my management 
> is happy... ;-)]

it's getting off topic, but i really dont get it why you cannot go via 
the standard LEDS framework, and why you have to hook into the x86 idle 
notifiers. (which we are hoping to get rid of)

RAS does not need that precise accounting. It just needs a heartbeat 
timer that tells it how to do the pretty lights and to report whether 
the CPU is still alive. Something that seems to be fully within the 
scope of LEDS. What am i missing?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/