Re: [PATCH] printk.caller

[Andrew Morton]

On Thu,  2 Oct 2008 16:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This adds the printk.caller=[0|1] boot parameter, default setting
> controlled by CONFIG_PRINTK_CALLER.  (This is modelled on printk.time
> and CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME.)
> 
> When this is set, each printk line is automagically prefixed with
> "{0x123abc} " giving the PC address of that printk call (actually
> the PC address just after the call).
> 
> As a kernel hacker, I always hate having to grep for some fragment
> of a message to find the code that generated it.  But I always have
> my -g vmlinux handy, so:
> 	(gdb) info line *(0x123abc - 1)
> is real handy (it pops the source up in an Emacs buffer).
> 

hm.  What do others think?

>
> ...
>
> +config PRINTK_CALLER
> +	bool "Show caller PC on printks"
> +	depends on PRINTK
> +	help
> +	  Selecting this option causes printk output to include
> +	  the PC address of the printk call.  This is useful for
> +	  kernels hackers to quickly locate the source code that
> +	  produced the message.
> +

This is quite misleading.  The config help implies that
CONFIG_PRINTK_CALLER will enable the feature at compile time.  But it
doesn't - it just sets the boot-time enable/disable default.

If you do this:

#ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK_CALLER
static int printk_caller = 1;
#else
#define printk_caller 0
#endif

then the implementation would somewhat reflect the config option.


But I'd suggest that this thing is so small that it doesn't need a
config option to enable the presence of the code - just make it
unconditional.

Also, I guess that the boot-time option is useful, but a runtime /proc
knob might also be needed?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/