Re: [RFC patch 0/5] genirq: add infrastructure for threadedinterrupt handlers

From: Arjan van de Ven
Date: Thu Oct 02 2008 - 18:33:52 EST


On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 14:31:46 -0700
Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 04:46:09PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > >
> > > - move long running handlers out of the hard interrupt context
> >
> > I'm not sure I'm really looking forward to this brave new world
> > of very long running interrupt handlers. e.g. what do you
> > do for example when some handler blocks for a very long time?
>
> We have this issue today with some irqs (USB is known for issue
> here...)
>
> So I don't think this is a big issue, and in the end, a better idea as
> it might force us to confront some of the big abusers and fix them.
>

one of the things irq threads gives you is that 'top' will show you
which ones are eating cpu ;-)


--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/