Re: [RFC patch 0/5] genirq: add infrastructure for threadedinterrupt handlers

[Daniel Walker]

On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 21:28 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > > Clearly threading irq handlers does have something to do with real 
> > > > time, unless this patch isn't actually threading anything ..
> 
> Well, that's clearly wrong: threaded IRQ handlers are not tied to 
> real-time in any way. Yes, they can be used for RT too but as far as the 
> upstream kernel is involved that's at most an afterthought.

You contradict yourself .. I said "Clearly threading irq handlers does
have something to do with real time" then you say "they can be used for 
RT too" .. So my comments are clearly correct , they have "something" to
do with real time. There exists a relationship of some kind or type.

You should go back and read my initial questions, they are reasonable ..

> > > Clearly you have neither clue about real time nor about operating 
> > > systems in general.
> > 
> > Here we go again Thomas.. You think you can have a conversation 
> > without the insults for once?
> 
> what Thomas said was a strong but fair reaction to your obviously 
> incorrect statement. What reaction did you expect?

We need less insults on this list not more.. Maybe I could understand
his reaction had I insulted him, but I didn't.. "Fair reaction" doesn't
fit in this case ..

Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/