Re: [PATCH 2/3] Memory management livelock

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thu Oct 02 2008 - 02:02:51 EST



> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Memory management livelock

Please don't send multiple patches with identical titles - think up a
good, unique, meaningful title for each patch.

On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:52:18 -0400 (EDT) Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Avoid starvation when walking address space.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
>

Please include a full changelog with each iteration of each patch.

That changelog should explain the reason for playing games with
bitlocks so Linus doesn't have kittens when he sees it.

> include/linux/pagemap.h | 1 +
> mm/filemap.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> mm/page-writeback.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> mm/truncate.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.27-rc7-devel/include/linux/pagemap.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.27-rc7-devel.orig/include/linux/pagemap.h 2008-09-24 02:57:37.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.27-rc7-devel/include/linux/pagemap.h 2008-09-24 02:59:04.000000000 +0200
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> #define AS_EIO (__GFP_BITS_SHIFT + 0) /* IO error on async write */
> #define AS_ENOSPC (__GFP_BITS_SHIFT + 1) /* ENOSPC on async write */
> #define AS_MM_ALL_LOCKS (__GFP_BITS_SHIFT + 2) /* under mm_take_all_locks() */
> +#define AS_STARVATION (__GFP_BITS_SHIFT + 3) /* an anti-starvation barrier */
>
> static inline void mapping_set_error(struct address_space *mapping, int error)
> {
> Index: linux-2.6.27-rc7-devel/mm/filemap.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.27-rc7-devel.orig/mm/filemap.c 2008-09-24 02:59:33.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.27-rc7-devel/mm/filemap.c 2008-09-24 03:13:47.000000000 +0200
> @@ -269,10 +269,19 @@ int wait_on_page_writeback_range(struct
> int nr_pages;
> int ret = 0;
> pgoff_t index;
> + long pages_to_process;
>
> if (end < start)
> return 0;
>
> + /*
> + * Estimate the number of pages to process. If we process significantly
> + * more than this, someone is making writeback pages under us.
> + * We must pull the anti-starvation plug.
> + */
> + pages_to_process = bdi_stat(mapping->backing_dev_info, BDI_WRITEBACK);
> + pages_to_process += (pages_to_process >> 3) + 16;

This sequence appears twice and it would probably be clearer to
implement it in a well-commented function.

> pagevec_init(&pvec, 0);
> index = start;
> while ((index <= end) &&
> @@ -288,6 +297,10 @@ int wait_on_page_writeback_range(struct
> if (page->index > end)
> continue;
>
> + if (pages_to_process >= 0)
> + if (!pages_to_process--)
> + wait_on_bit_lock(&mapping->flags, AS_STARVATION, wait_action_schedule, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);

This is copied three times and perhaps also should be factored out.

Please note that an effort has been made to make mm/filemap.c look
presentable in an 80-col display.

> wait_on_page_writeback(page);
> if (PageError(page))
> ret = -EIO;
> @@ -296,6 +309,13 @@ int wait_on_page_writeback_range(struct
> cond_resched();
> }
>
> + if (pages_to_process < 0) {
> + smp_mb__before_clear_bit();
> + clear_bit(AS_STARVATION, &mapping->flags);
> + smp_mb__after_clear_bit();
> + wake_up_bit(&mapping->flags, AS_STARVATION);
> + }

This sequence is repeated three or four times and should be pulled out
into a well-commented function. That comment should explain the logic
behind the use of these barriers, please.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/