Re: [RFC][Resend] Make NFS-Client readahead tunable

From: Martin Knoblauch
Date: Thu Sep 18 2008 - 03:43:17 EST


----- Original Message ----

> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Greg Banks <gnb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Martin Knoblauch <knobi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-nfs list <linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 5:13:34 AM
> Subject: Re: [RFC][Resend] Make NFS-Client readahead tunable
>
> On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:42:54 +1000 Greg Banks wrote:
>
> > I think having a tunable for client readahead is an excellent idea,
> > although not to solve your particular problem. The SLES10 kernel has a
> > patch which does precisely that, perhaps Neil could post it.
> >
> > I don't think there's a lot of point having both a module parameter and
> > a sysctl.
>
> mount -o remount,readahead=42

[root@lpsdm52 ~]# mount -o remount,readahead=42 /net/spsdms/fs13
Bad nfs mount parameter: readahead
[root@lpsdm52 ~]# mount -o readahead=42 /net/spsdms/fs13
Bad nfs mount parameter: readahead


I assume the reply was meant to say that the correct way of introducing a modifyable readahead size is to implement it as a mount option ? :-) I considered it, but it seems to be more intrusive than the workaround patch. It also needs changes to userspace tools - correct?

Cheers
Martin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/