Re: [PATCH] dm-snapshot: poor copy-on-write performance due to I/Oreordering

[Kazuo Ito]

Hi,

Bodo Eggert wrote:
> Kazuo Ito <ito.kazuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Write throughput to LVM snapshot origin volume is an order
> > of magnitude slower than those to LV without snapshots or
> > snapshot target volumes, especially in the case of sequential
> > writes with O_SYNC on.
> >
> > The following patch originally written by Kevin Jamieson and
> > Jan Blunck and slightly modified for the current RCs by myself
> > tries to improve the performance by modifying the behaviour
> > of kcopyd, so that it pushes back an I/O job to the head of
> > the job queue instead of the tail as process_jobs() currently
> > does when it has to wait for free pages. This way, write
> > requests aren't shuffled to cause extra seeks.
>
> Did you check for starvation problems, too?

I ran sadc along with the tests and figures like
%memused, kbbuffers and kbcached didn't change much
before and after the patch.  And since the buffered I/O
results didn't deteriorate at least in the cases of
10 and 100 megabyte sequential writes, I assumed
there should be plentiful of memory for the kernel
to use at least in these cases.

Anyway I can send you more detailed info upon your request.

Regards,

Kazuo Ito, NTT Open Source Software Center
Phone: +81-3-5860-5125 / FAX: +81-3-5463-5690 / E-mail: ito.kazuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/