Re: sys_paccept: disable paccept() until API design is resolved

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 09/16, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
>
> Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>
> > * The behavior of paccept() when interrupted by a signal is IMO
> >   strange:
>
> You use your own opinion as the deciding factor?

It would be very strange if Michael used the somebody else's opinion ;)

> The behavior differs
> from other uses but is consistent with the accept() behavior.

And Michael asks why this behaviour (and paccept() itself) is useful.
I must admit I don't understand this too.

It is very possible that we both just need the help from expert (you).
(Ulrich, there is no irony, seriously).

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/