Re: [RFC v5][PATCH 0/9] Kernel based checkpoint/restart

[Serge E. Hallyn]

Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx):
> These patches implement basic checkpoint-restart [CR]. This version (v5)
> supports basic tasks with simple private memory, and open files (regular
> files and directories only). The main changes include rework of memory
> restart code and response to feedback. See original announcements below.
> 
> Oren.

At the kernel summit, it was asked whether at some point this CR work
could be used as the basis for a new suspend to disk implementation.
I answered that we don't plan to handle kernel threads.  In your
experience, are there any reasons why eventually we couldn't eventually
handle kernel threads?

-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/