Re: [PATCH -mm] memcg: fix handling of shmem migration

From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Date: Wed Sep 17 2008 - 02:32:53 EST


On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:19:51 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hmm, something like this?
>
> ---
> @@ -734,6 +734,9 @@ int mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page, struct page *newpa
> if (mem_cgroup_subsys.disabled)
> return 0;
>
> + if (PageSwapBacked(page))
> + SetPageSwapBacked(newpage);
> +
> lock_page_cgroup(page);
> pc = page_get_page_cgroup(page);
> if (pc) {
> ---
>
> Or, adding MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_SHMEM and
>
> ---
> @@ -740,7 +740,10 @@ int mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page, struct page *newp
> mem = pc->mem_cgroup;
> css_get(&mem->css);
> if (pc->flags & PAGE_CGROUP_FLAG_CACHE)
> - ctype = MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_CACHE;
> + if (page_is_file_cache(page))
> + ctype = MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_CACHE;
> + else
> + ctype = MEM_CGROUP_CHARGE_TYPE_SHMEM;
> }
> unlock_page_cgroup(page);
> if (mem) {
> ---
> (Of course, mem_cgroup_charge_common should be modified too.)
>
like this :) I don't want to change logic in migration.c
(and this is special case handling for memcg.)

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/