Re: [RFC 2/4] introduce dynamically allocated system vectors
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Sun Sep 14 2008 - 11:47:32 EST
* Dean Nelson <dcn@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> @@ -1219,42 +1246,40 @@ static int __assign_irq_vector(int irq,
> * 0x80, because int 0x80 is hm, kind of importantish. ;)
> */
> static int current_vector = FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR, current_offset = 0;
> - unsigned int old_vector;
> + cpumask_t target_cpus_mask;
hm. One SGI developer (Mike Travis) is busy removing on-kernel-stack
cpumask_t variables. Other one (you) is busy reintroducing them:
> + cpumask_t target_cpus_mask;
> + cpumask_t domain;
> + cpumask_t new_domain_mask = CPU_MASK_NONE;
in multiple ...
> + cpumask_t mask = TARGET_CPUS;
... functions.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/