Re: [RFC 2/4] introduce dynamically allocated system vectors

[Ingo Molnar]

* Dean Nelson <dcn@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> @@ -1219,42 +1246,40 @@ static int __assign_irq_vector(int irq, 
>  	 * 0x80, because int 0x80 is hm, kind of importantish. ;)
>  	 */
>  	static int current_vector = FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR, current_offset = 0;
> -	unsigned int old_vector;
> +	cpumask_t target_cpus_mask;

hm. One SGI developer (Mike Travis) is busy removing on-kernel-stack 
cpumask_t variables. Other one (you) is busy reintroducing them:

> +	cpumask_t target_cpus_mask;
> +	cpumask_t domain;
> +	cpumask_t new_domain_mask = CPU_MASK_NONE;

in multiple ...

> +	cpumask_t mask = TARGET_CPUS;

... functions.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/