Re: [PATCH 2/2] ehea: fix mutex and spinlock use

From: Jeff Garzik
Date: Sat Sep 13 2008 - 15:31:22 EST


Sebastien Dugue wrote:
Looks like to me that the ehea_fw_handles.lock mutex and the
ehea_bcmc_regs.lock spinlock are taken much longer than necessary and could
as well be pushed inside the functions that need them
(ehea_update_firmware_handles() and ehea_update_bcmc_registrations())
rather than at each callsite.

Signed-off-by: Sebastien Dugue <sebastien.dugue@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c | 26 ++++----------------------
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c b/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c
index b70c531..c765ec6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c
@@ -219,9 +219,11 @@ static void ehea_update_firmware_handles(void)
}
out_update:
+ mutex_lock(&ehea_fw_handles.lock);
kfree(ehea_fw_handles.arr);
ehea_fw_handles.arr = arr;
ehea_fw_handles.num_entries = i;
+ mutex_unlock(&ehea_fw_handles.lock);
}
static void ehea_update_bcmc_registrations(void)
@@ -293,9 +295,11 @@ static void ehea_update_bcmc_registrations(void)
}
out_update:
+ spin_lock(&ehea_bcmc_regs.lock);
kfree(ehea_bcmc_regs.arr);
ehea_bcmc_regs.arr = arr;
ehea_bcmc_regs.num_entries = i;
+ spin_unlock(&ehea_bcmc_regs.lock);
}
static struct net_device_stats *ehea_get_stats(struct net_device *dev)
@@ -1770,8 +1774,6 @@ static int ehea_set_mac_addr(struct net_device *dev, void *sa)
memcpy(dev->dev_addr, mac_addr->sa_data, dev->addr_len);
- spin_lock(&ehea_bcmc_regs.lock);
-
/* Deregister old MAC in pHYP */
if (port->state == EHEA_PORT_UP) {
ret = ehea_broadcast_reg_helper(port, H_DEREG_BCMC);
@@ -1792,7 +1794,6 @@ static int ehea_set_mac_addr(struct net_device *dev, void *sa)
out_upregs:
ehea_update_bcmc_registrations();
- spin_unlock(&ehea_bcmc_regs.lock);
out_free:
kfree(cb0);
out:
@@ -1954,8 +1955,6 @@ static void ehea_set_multicast_list(struct net_device *dev)
}
ehea_promiscuous(dev, 0);
- spin_lock(&ehea_bcmc_regs.lock);
-
if (dev->flags & IFF_ALLMULTI) {
ehea_allmulti(dev, 1);
goto out;
@@ -1985,7 +1984,6 @@ static void ehea_set_multicast_list(struct net_device *dev)
}
out:
ehea_update_bcmc_registrations();
- spin_unlock(&ehea_bcmc_regs.lock);
return;
}
@@ -2466,8 +2464,6 @@ static int ehea_up(struct net_device *dev)
if (port->state == EHEA_PORT_UP)
return 0;
- mutex_lock(&ehea_fw_handles.lock);
-
ret = ehea_port_res_setup(port, port->num_def_qps,
port->num_add_tx_qps);
if (ret) {
@@ -2504,8 +2500,6 @@ static int ehea_up(struct net_device *dev)
}
}
- spin_lock(&ehea_bcmc_regs.lock);
-
ret = ehea_broadcast_reg_helper(port, H_REG_BCMC);
if (ret) {
ret = -EIO;
@@ -2527,10 +2521,8 @@ out:
ehea_info("Failed starting %s. ret=%i", dev->name, ret);
ehea_update_bcmc_registrations();
- spin_unlock(&ehea_bcmc_regs.lock);
ehea_update_firmware_handles();
- mutex_unlock(&ehea_fw_handles.lock);
return ret;
}
@@ -2580,9 +2572,6 @@ static int ehea_down(struct net_device *dev)
if (port->state == EHEA_PORT_DOWN)
return 0;
- mutex_lock(&ehea_fw_handles.lock);
-
- spin_lock(&ehea_bcmc_regs.lock);
ehea_drop_multicast_list(dev);
ehea_broadcast_reg_helper(port, H_DEREG_BCMC);
@@ -2591,7 +2580,6 @@ static int ehea_down(struct net_device *dev)
port->state = EHEA_PORT_DOWN;
ehea_update_bcmc_registrations();
- spin_unlock(&ehea_bcmc_regs.lock);
ret = ehea_clean_all_portres(port);
if (ret)
@@ -2599,7 +2587,6 @@ static int ehea_down(struct net_device *dev)
dev->name, ret);
ehea_update_firmware_handles();
- mutex_unlock(&ehea_fw_handles.lock);
return ret;
}
@@ -3378,7 +3365,6 @@ static int __devinit ehea_probe_adapter(struct of_device *dev,
ehea_error("Invalid ibmebus device probed");
return -EINVAL;
}
- mutex_lock(&ehea_fw_handles.lock);
adapter = kzalloc(sizeof(*adapter), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!adapter) {
@@ -3462,7 +3448,6 @@ out_free_ad:
out:
ehea_update_firmware_handles();
- mutex_unlock(&ehea_fw_handles.lock);
return ret;
}
@@ -3481,8 +3466,6 @@ static int __devexit ehea_remove(struct of_device *dev)
flush_scheduled_work();
- mutex_lock(&ehea_fw_handles.lock);
-
ibmebus_free_irq(adapter->neq->attr.ist1, adapter);
tasklet_kill(&adapter->neq_tasklet);

applied


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/