Re: 2.6.27-rc6 xen soft lockup

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

Rambaldi wrote:
> The machine has two Intel(R) Xeon(R) E5420's so that gives a total of
> 8 cpu's
> During the time of the lockup the cpu load, as measured with cacti,
> was about 4%
> with a increase to 15% at the time the BUG was triggered. So I would
> say mostly idle
> but not very idle.

So that's the cpu load within the domain?  How about the overall system
load?  What other domains are running?

>
> > Did anything fail or misbehave?
> No nothing failed or misbehaved (as far as I could tell)
>
> With dynticks I guess you mean: CONFIG_NO_HZ ; this option is not set.

(In general its a good idea to set it for virtual machines, to avoid
spuriously scheduling vcpus.)

> I have attached my .config. I have also attached the output of
> (date ; cat /proc/interrupts ; sleep 10 ; date ;  cat /proc/interrupts
> )> /tmp/interrupts
> to give an impression about the number of interrupts after 11:30 hours
> of uptime.

Well, there were 1001 interrupts on cpu 1 in that interval, which shows
that the timer interrupts are going at full rate on the idle cpu.

I'm a bit confused.  I'm not sure what would trigger a lockup at that
point, unless it really stopped taking interrupts for a while. 
Unfortunately the RIP and backtrace are not particularly helpful.  I'm
assuming the message is spurious, and indicates some other kind of
timekeeping bug.

> Any other info that you need?

Full dmesg output, for completeness.

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/