Re: [PATCH] x86: io-apic - get rid of __DO_ACTION macro

From: Yinghai Lu
Date: Wed Sep 10 2008 - 13:30:50 EST


On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> * Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > ...
>> >>
>> >> hope we can keep using MACRO..
>> >>
>> >> YH
>> >>
>> >
>> > Btw, Yinghai, what does it mean? To not touch this macro at all?
>> > Or you mean about implementation issue (ie the design itself)?
>>
>> do not touch this macro... and may revisit after 2.6.28
>
> anything you are particularly worried about? Regressions we should be
> able to find pretty quickly, in a central macro like that - and the
> macro is quite ugly.
>

ok, let remove unneeded "if", and use function pointer...

void (*extra_action_t)(struct irq_pin_list *entry);

+static inline void io_apic_modify_irq(unsigned int irq,
+ int mask_and, int mask_or,
+ int mask_and_not, extra_action_t action)
+{
+ int pin;
+ struct irq_cfg *cfg;
+ struct irq_pin_list *entry;
+ cfg = irq_cfg(irq);
+ for (entry = cfg->irq_2_pin; entry != NULL; entry = entry->next) {
+ unsigned int reg;
+ pin = entry->pin;
+ reg = io_apic_read(entry->apic, 0x10 + pin * 2);
+ reg &= mask_and;
+ reg |= mask_or;
+ reg &= ~mask_and_not;
+ io_apic_modify(entry->apic, 0x10 + pin * 2, reg);
+ if (action)
+ action(entry);
+ }
+}

+void extra_read(struct irq_pin_list *entry)
+ {
+ /*
+ * Synchronize the IO-APIC and the CPU by doing
+ * a dummy read from the IO-APIC
+ */
+ struct io_apic __iomem *io_apic;
+ io_apic = io_apic_base(entry->apic);
+ readl(&io_apic->data);
+ }


YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/