Re: [PATCH 0/3] smp: reduce stack requirements forsmp_call_function_mask
From: David Miller
Date: Mon Sep 08 2008 - 16:48:22 EST
From: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:11:59 -0700
> I was wondering if we'd need to be able to default a cpumask_t pointer
> argument to be a const and then use a different method for those cases
> where it shouldn't be? This would strengthen the compiler type checking
> of functions calls.
Yes, of course, the pointer should be const.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/