Re: [git pull] x86 fixes

[Ingo Molnar]

* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>
>> the ideal case would be "support them all"
>
> Not really.  That would include things like the i386, which is a bunch 
> of really nasty stuff.

agreed - especially the verify_area() impact makes it a non-starter.

but 486 and higher is certainly quite reasonable, and is still being 
tested.

... and _in practice_ 99% of all systems that run Linux today understand 
CMOV.

... _and_ in practice 99% of all new Linux systems shipped today are 
Core2 or better.

... and so on it goes with this argument. Everyone has a different 
target audience and there's no firm limit. Maybe what makes more sense 
is to have some sort of time dependency:

  support all x86 CPUs released in the last year
  support all x86 CPUs released in the past 5 years
  support all x86 CPUs released in the past 10 years
  support all x86 CPUs released ever
  [ ... or configure a specific model ]

and people/distributions would use _those_ switches. That means we could 
continuously tweak those targets, as systems become obsolete and new 
CPUs arrive.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/