Re: [PATCH 0/3] smp: reduce stack requirements for smp_call_function_mask

[Jes Sorensen]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Applies to linux-2.6.tip/master (with FUZZ).
>
> applied to tip/cpus4096, thanks Mike.
>
> I'm still wondering whether we should get rid of non-reference based 
> cpumask_t altogether ...

Cool,

I think we should, it's like a ticking bomb waiting to explode on us
eventually. IMHO it was a big mistake to allow cpumask_t being passed
by value in the first place.

Cheers,
Jes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/