Re: [PATCH 2/2] ne.c msleep not mdelay

[Alan Cox]

On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:44:53 -0500
David Fries <david@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> mdelay(10) replaced by msleep(10) to give up the CPU, it's just
> waiting for an interrupt, so timing isn't critical.

It is too critical for a reschedule to occur.

NAK this one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/