Re: TALPA - a threat model? well sorta.

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 12:07 +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
> It seems to me that this "scan on file open" business is the
> wrong way to do things - because it reduces performance.
> 
> If you scan on file open, then your security sw is too late and
> getting in the way.
> 
> It is better to scan in advance. Most machines has lots of idle time.
> Use that time to scan in advance, and mark the files as "clean".
> 
> A "clean" file can be opened without further checking anytime - giving
> normal high performance.  A file that gets written to becomes "dirty"
> until checked again. Some mechanism for making a clean copy of a
> clean file might help avoid excessive "dirtying".
> 
> "Scan on open" might still be useful for cases when the system
> haven't kept up with writing, but please don't aim to have
> this be the _primary_ mode of scanning. A file server
> where most of the stuff is pre-scanned will likely perform much better
> than  one scanning everything on open.

This is the source of all that scan on write/close rambling I've seen go
past the last couple of days..

So I'd not worry about this particular aspect

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/