Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/1] cxgb3i: cxgb3 iSCSI initiator

[David Miller]

From: Tom Tucker <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 20:26:51 -0500

> Can you explain how this "information" somehow doesn't qualify as 
> "state". Doesn't the next expected sequence number at the very least 
> need to be updated? una? etc...?
> 
> Could you also include the "non-state-full" information necessary to do 
> iSCSI header digest validation, data placement, and marker removal? 

It's stateless because the full packet traverses the real networking
stack and thus can be treated like any other packet.

The data placement is a side effect that the networking stack can
completely ignore if it chooses to.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/