Re: Kernel oops with 2.6.26, padlock and ipsec: probably problem with fpu state changes

[Herbert Xu]

On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 10:52:48AM -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
>
> > Actually I was mistaken, Intel has done the right thing by not
> > generating a fault on crc32c with TS set.
> 
> Yes, the documentation seems to says so. But I am double checking
> with experts inside, to make sure we got the SDM right.

Thanks for checking this!
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/