Re: Set_up irq problem while using gpio

From: Ben Dooks
Date: Tue Jul 15 2008 - 08:32:39 EST


On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:34:23AM +0530, sasa sasa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have query that the below patch has to applied on irq/manage.c file or not.
> --- kernel_old/irq/manage.c 2008-02-07 22:11:14.000000000 +0530
> +++ kernel_new/irq/manage.c 2008-02-07 22:19:14.000000000 +0530
> @@ -349,8 +349,14 @@
> /* Setup the type (level, edge polarity) if configured: */
> if (new->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK) {
> if (desc->chip && desc->chip->set_type)
> - desc->chip->set_type(irq,
> - new->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK);
> + {
> + if((desc->chip->set_type(irq,
> + new->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK)))
> + {
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
> + return -ESPIPE;
> + }
> + }

this is difficult to read, a better way would be to

ret = desc->chip->set_type(irq, new->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK)
if (ret) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
return ret;
}


If set_type() is meant to return an error, this should have been done
from the start, instead of being ignored.

tbh, the code could be further cleaned up by holding
the (new->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK in a variable such as new_trigger
which would stop the problem of wrapping lines...

> The reason is that in case of gpio pins used as interrupt pin but that
> pin has already been ocuupied in other mode (like alternate function
> mode or in software mode) by other device. In that case, some error
> mechanism must be there, if we are requesting that gpio pin as
> interrupt through request_irq function.

Hmm, I thought (when implementing the s3c24xx irq support) that
requesting the IRQ should change the pin mode appropriately.

--
Ben (ben@xxxxxxxxx, http://www.fluff.org/)

'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/