Re: [GIT *] Allow request_firmware() to be satisfied from in-kernel,use it in more drivers.

From: david
Date: Mon Jul 14 2008 - 22:52:45 EST


On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, David Woodhouse wrote:

On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 19:17 -0700, David Miller wrote:
When module support was added, guess what? I could still build a
completely static kernel image like I always could.

And in fact, to this day, that's what I personally do because that's
how I like my kernels.

Good. You can still do precisely that, and build the firmware into your
kernel. You can have exactly what you like. Hey, you can build even
_more_ firmware into your kernel now. You can have NFS-root on devices
you previously had to use an initrd for. hth.

we recognise that a monolithic kernel can have the firmware embedded in it (and I thank you for doing so, this will help me with my Intel wireless cards). the objection is that you can't embed firmware into modules.

But this request_firmware() change does not allow one to get what he
could get before, which is a completely self-contained driver module
object file.

This is the difference between providing an option and making
something mandatory. This firmware split up is now mandatory.

In all the years we've been using request_firmware(), nobody ever asked
for a way to build the firmware _into_ the .ko file, until now. Why is
it suddenly so important for a small handful of older network drivers,
when nobody else has ever seen the need for it -- even in modern network
drivers?

the reason the objections are showing up now is that the drivers that previously had the firmware embedded in them (so that nobody but the driver author needed to even know that there _was_ firmware involved) are now being converted to use request_firmware(). that change is breaking the invisability of the firmware that they have cultivated. if they had the option to keep things as they are (even while you provide the option for others to move the firmware out) they could not object like they are.

David Lang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/