Re: [PATCH 3/3] Add timeout feature

From: Pavel Machek
Date: Mon Jul 14 2008 - 02:35:50 EST


On Sun 2008-07-13 13:15:43, jim owens wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
>
>>> This means ONLY SOME metadata (or no metadata) is flushed and
>>> then all metadata updates are stopped. User/kernel writes
>>> to already allocated file pages WILL go to a frozen disk.
>>
>> That's the difference here. They do write file data, and thus avoid
>> mmap()-writes problem.
>>
>> ...and they _still_ provide auto-thaw.
>> Pavel
>
> One of the hardest things to make people understand is that
> stopping file data writes in the filesystem during a freeze
> is not just dangerous, it is also __worthless__ unless you
> have a complete "user environment freeze" mechanism.

Eh?

> And unless each independent component has a freeze and they
> can all be coordinated, the data in the pipeline is never
> stable enough to say "if you stop all writes to disk and
> take a snapshot, this is the same as an orderly shutdown,
> backup, restore, and startup".

If you also freeze data writes, at least snapshot is not worse than
_unexpected_ shutdown.

And apps should already be ready for unexpected shutdowns (using fsync
etc).

Pavel

--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/