Re: [RFT] x86 acpi: normalize segment descriptor register on resume

[Ingo Molnar]

* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Bingo.  It's a HAL quirk.
> > 
> > Testing from the console (not X):
> > 
> > With 4b4f7280:
> > # echo mem >/sys/power/state -- works fine
> > 
> > # echo 3 >/proc/sys/kernel/acpi_video_flags
> > # echo mem >/sys/power state -- fails to resume
> > 
> > Without 4b4f7280:
> > # echo mem >/sys/power/state -- works fine
> > 
> > # echo 3 >/proc/sys/kernel/acpi_video_flags
> > # echo mem >/sys/power state -- works fine
> > 
> > So HAL contains an apparently unnecessary quirk for my laptop, and 
> > 4b4f7280 breaks that quirk.  Of course, it's entirely possible that 
> > 4b4f7280 is 100% correct, but that the quirk only worked by accident and 
> > 4b4f7280 broke the call into video BIOS.
> 
> We've had reports from users of Intel graphics and the i915 driver 
> that previously working quirks started to break their systems with 
> 2.6.26-rc, but instead the plain "echo mem > /sys/power/state" started 
> to work for them. Your system may be one of these, but I wonder what 
> the effect of commit 4b4f7280 is.
> 
> The first possibility is that the quirks actually didn't work on your 
> system with 2.6.26-rc before commit 4b4f7280 at all for some obscure 
> reason and that commit made them work again which in turn resulted in 
> the breakage.
> 
> The second possibility is that commit 4b4f7280 actually broke those 
> quirks.
> 
> I'm not sure if it's worth the effort to check which of the above 
> really happened.  After all, you can suspend and resume the box 
> without any quirks now. ;-)

which is the ideal situation :-)

we still need to find the HAL quirk and disable it, right?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/