Re: [patch] power, xen64: fix PM_SLEEP build dependencies (was: Re: [PATCH 00 of 55] xen64: implement 64-bit Xen support)

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Wed Jul 09 2008 - 15:57:57 EST


On Wednesday, 9 of July 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > -tip testing found another PM/PM_SLEEP victim:
> >
> > arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o: In function `suspend':
> > apm_32.c:(.text+0xedb5): undefined reference to `save_processor_state'
> > apm_32.c:(.text+0xedd0): undefined reference to `restore_processor_state'
>
> ah, found it - the arch-level power/ directory had a CONFIG_PM-only
> build dependency as well. Fixed via the commit below.
>
> Ingo
>
> ------------->
> commit 6666fa5ebb7c78afcab540bf183c7f070c890930
> Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed Jul 9 21:45:54 2008 +0200
>
> power, xen64: fix PM_SLEEP build dependencies, #2
>
> -tip testing found another PM/PM_SLEEP victim:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o: In function `suspend':
> apm_32.c:(.text+0xedb5): undefined reference to `save_processor_state'
> apm_32.c:(.text+0xedd0): undefined reference to `restore_processor_state'
>
> with this config:
>
> http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config-Wed_Jul__9_18_53_45_CEST_2008.bad
>
> the core scenario is this combination (and only this combination) of
> config values:
>
> # CONFIG_PM is not set
> CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=y
> CONFIG_APM=y
> CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y
> CONFIG_XEN=y

This combination actually doesn't make sense whatsoever.

PM_SLEEP depends (indirectly) on PM and the fact that it's possible to use
a .config violating this dependency is a build system problem, really.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/