Re: [patch 12/13] GRU Driver V3 - export is_uv_system(),zap_page_range() & follow_page()

From: Arjan van de Ven
Date: Mon Jul 07 2008 - 14:59:57 EST


On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 17:29:54 +0100 (BST)
Hugh Dickins <hugh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Jack Steiner wrote:
> > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(follow_page);
> > >
> > > NACK.
> > >
> > > These should never be called by a driver and suggest you need to
> > > rething your VM integration in this driver.
> >
> > Can you provide some additional details on the type of kernel API
> > that could be exported to provide a pte lookup in atomic context?
>
> I don't see EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(follow_page) as objectionable myself:
> it rather seems rather to complement EXPORT_SYMBOL(vm_insert_page)
> and EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_to_page); though I'd agree that it's
> sufficiently sensitive to need that _GPL on it.
>
> ...
>
> > Currently, the driver calls follow_page() in interrupt context.
>
> However, that's a problem, isn't it, given the pte_offset_map_lock
> in follow_page? To avoid the possibility of deadlock, wouldn't we
> have to change all the page table locking to irq-disabling variants?
> Which I think we'd have reason to prefer not to do.
>
> Maybe study the assumptions Nick is making in his arch/x86/mm/gup.c
> in mm, and do something similar in your GRU driver (falling back to
> the slow method when anything's not quite right). It's not nice to
> have such code out in a driver, but GRU is going to be exceptional,
> and it may be better to have it out there than pretence of generality
> in the core mm exporting it.
>

I wonder if GRU even should be a module; it sounds rather like pretty
core functionality and if it's this invasive to the VM it probably
should be a real part of the VM instead
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/