Re: [PATCH 1/2] swsusp: simplify memory_bm_find_bit()

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Saturday, 5 of July 2008, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> The bit obtained by the function memory_bm_find_bit() is represented
> by addr and bit_nr. The callers of memory_bm_find_bit() just use addr
> and bit_nr as the arguments of set_bit/clear_bit/test_bit.
> 
> This patch simplifies the representation of the obtained bit without
> using BM_BITS_PER_CHUNK.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
>  kernel/power/snapshot.c |    4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: 2.6-git/kernel/power/snapshot.c
> ===================================================================
> --- 2.6-git.orig/kernel/power/snapshot.c
> +++ 2.6-git/kernel/power/snapshot.c
> @@ -478,8 +478,8 @@ static int memory_bm_find_bit(struct mem
>  	}
>  	zone_bm->cur_block = bb;
>  	pfn -= bb->start_pfn;
> -	*bit_nr = pfn % BM_BITS_PER_CHUNK;
> -	*addr = bb->data + pfn / BM_BITS_PER_CHUNK;
> +	*bit_nr = pfn;
> +	*addr = bb->data;
>  	return 0;
>  }

Hm, I think it's better to fold that into patch 2/2.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/