Re: 2.6.26-rc9: Reported regressions from 2.6.25

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Sun Jul 06 2008 - 14:01:24 EST


On Sunday, 6 of July 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 07:05:49PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Also, in the next couple of days I'll be closing the bugs the reporters of
> > which have been totally unresponsive.
> >...
>
> If no action by us gets combined with automated weekly emails then
> no responses to the latter is not an unexpected event.
>
> Such a submitter might be perfectly responsive to actual work on a bug
> while really pissed off by getting the bug closed.
>
> Look e.g. at #10865 that had a 1 month gap in submitter responses,
> but the actual problem is that noone of us ever bothered to look at
> this Oops...
>
> I just did a run through all open 2.6.26-rc regressions, and I did not
> find a single one where we seem to be waiting for some time for an
> answer of the submitter. [1]

The following are my candidates:

10629
10786
10815
10906 (the thread has apparently died)
11009

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/