Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] linux-next: Tree for June 30

[Eric W. Biederman]

"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Here is a patch to replace the hard-coded limit with dynamic allocation. I have
> only build-tested it, but it seems to work.
>
> Please try it out; barring any screams to the contrary I'll add it to -tip.

Looks reasonable to me.  When generalizing from a test program to something
that can be used every day I think I just overlooked the fact that I had not
dynamically allocated the section count.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/