Re: [patch] ADJ_OFFSET_SS_READ and capabilities

[john stultz]

On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 09:32 +0200, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> Hi Roman, John,
> 
> ADJ_OFFSET_SS_READ is a read-only operation.  Therefore, it seems
> reasonable not to require any capability (as is the case when 'modes'
> is zero.  See the patch below.  Does this change seem reasonable?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Michael
> 
> --- linux-2.6.26-rc5/kernel/time/ntp.c	2008-06-13 11:16:51.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.26-rc5-p/kernel/time/ntp.c	2008-06-22 07:31:43.000000000 +0200
> @@ -281,7 +281,8 @@
>   	int result;
> 
>   	/* In order to modify anything, you gotta be super-user! */
> -	if (txc->modes && !capable(CAP_SYS_TIME))
> +	if (txc->modes && txc->modes != ADJ_OFFSET_SS_READ &&
> +	    !capable(CAP_SYS_TIME))
>   		return -EPERM;
> 
>   	/* Now we validate the data before disabling interrupts */
> 


Hey Michael,
	This seems like an ok change, but we'd first want to fix the issue you
pointed out earlier which would make sure adjtimex() read calls don't
cause side effects.

thanks
-john



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/