Re: [PATCH 08/60] microblaze_v4: exception handling

[Michal Simek]

> On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:29 AM,  <monstr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> +ex_sw:
>> +       /* Get the destination register number into r5 */
>> +       lbui    r5, r0, ex_reg_op;
>> +       /* Form store_word jump table offset (sw_table + (8 * regnum)) */
>> +       la      r6, r0, sw_table;
>> +       add     r5, r5, r5;
>> +       add     r5, r5, r5;
>> +       add     r5, r5, r5;
>> +       add     r5, r5, r6;
>> +       bra     r5;
> 
> Possibly stupid question: This is part of the unaligned store word
> exception handler, yes? Shouldn't the above add's be addk's to
> preserve the state of the carry register pre/post store?

I don't think that addk is important. I have some tests for exception, I want to
cover full exception handling.

M

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/