Re: [PATCH 59/60] microblaze_v4: syscall_table.S and unistd.h

[H. Peter Anvin]

Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> You still set __NR_fork. There is no point defining the number if you
> can't actually call the syscall in the first place.

Worse, it is actively *harmful* to set the number; klibc or anything 
that uses similar kinds of scripts for portability will see the symbol 
and think the system call is available.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/