Re: [PATCH 1/6] Extend completions to provide XFS object flushrequirements

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Thu Jun 26 2008 - 09:12:44 EST


On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 09:21:33PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Ok, so that involves exactly what? A new header file, a new API name
> (ideas anyone?) and kerneldoc comments?

Yes, probably just a new header with properly documented functions.
Thew two non-trivial ones you added should probably not be inlines,
btw.

flush_lock_init/flush_lock/flush_trylock/flush_done/flush_is_locked?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/