Re: [patch] make siginfo_t si_utime + si_sstime report times in USER_HZ, not HZ

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 06/25, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>
> --- /home/mtk/ARCHIVE/KERNEL/linux-2.6.26-rc7/kernel/signal.c.orig	2008-06-24
> 16:20:39.000000000 +0200
> +++ /home/mtk/ARCHIVE/KERNEL/linux-2.6.26-rc7/kernel/signal.c	2008-06-24
> 16:22:17.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1379,10 +1379,9 @@
> 
>  	info.si_uid = tsk->uid;
> 
> -	/* FIXME: find out whether or not this is supposed to be c*time. */
> -	info.si_utime = cputime_to_jiffies(cputime_add(tsk->utime,
> +	info.si_utime = cputime_to_clock_t(cputime_add(tsk->utime,
>  						       tsk->signal->utime));
> -	info.si_stime = cputime_to_jiffies(cputime_add(tsk->stime,
> +	info.si_stime = cputime_to_clock_t(cputime_add(tsk->stime,
>  						       tsk->signal->stime));
> 
>  	info.si_status = tsk->exit_code & 0x7f;
> @@ -1450,9 +1449,8 @@
> 
>  	info.si_uid = tsk->uid;
> 
> -	/* FIXME: find out whether or not this is supposed to be c*time. */
> -	info.si_utime = cputime_to_jiffies(tsk->utime);
> -	info.si_stime = cputime_to_jiffies(tsk->stime);
> +	info.si_utime = cputime_to_clock_t(tsk->utime);
> +	info.si_stime = cputime_to_clock_t(tsk->stime);
> 
>   	info.si_code = why;
>   	switch (why) {

This looks like the obviously good fix to me.

The patch also deletes the comment about signal_struct->cXtime,
this also looks right: why should we use cutime/cstime ?

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/