Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xensupport

[Ingo Molnar]

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Anyway, that's all theory - i'll try out your patchset in -tip to see 
> what breaks in practice ;-)

i've put the commits (and a good number of dependent commits) into the 
new tip/x86/xen-64bit topic branch.

It quickly broke the build in testing:

 include/asm/pgalloc.h: In function âparavirt_pgd_free':
 include/asm/pgalloc.h:14: error: parameter name omitted
 arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S: In file included from 
 arch/x86/kernel/traps_64.c:51:include/asm/pgalloc.h: In function âparavirt_pgd_free':
 include/asm/pgalloc.h:14: error: parameter name omitted
 [...]

with this config:

  http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config-Wed_Jun_25_16_37_51_CEST_2008.bad

this could easily be some integration mistake on my part, so please 
double-check the end result.

Merging it into tip/master is a bit tricky, due to various interactions. 
This should work fine if you check out the latest tip/master:

  git-merge tip/x86/xen-64bit
  [ ... fix up the trivial merge conflict ... ]

i've already merged tip/x86/xen-64bit-base topic into master, to make it 
easier. (there were a few preconditions for the 64-bit Xen patches which 
arent carried in linux-next - such as the nmi-safe changes.)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/