Re: [RFC][PATCH] prevent incorrect oom under split_lru

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 15:56 +0900, MinChan Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 3:08 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
> <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Kim-san,
> >
> >> >> So, if priority==0, We should try to reclaim all page for prevent OOM.
> >> >
> >> > You are absolutely right.  Good catch.
> >>
> >> I have a concern about application latency.
> >> If lru list have many pages, it take a very long time to scan pages.
> >> More system have many ram, More many time to scan pages.
> >
> > No problem.
> >
> > priority==0 indicate emergency.
> > it doesn't happend on typical workload.
> >
> 
> I see :)
> 
> But if such emergency happen in embedded system, application can't be
> executed for some time.
> I am not sure how long time it take.
> But In some application, schedule period is very important than memory
> reclaim latency.
> 
> Now, In your patch, when such emergency happen, it continue to reclaim
> page until it will scan entire page of lru list.
> It

IMHO embedded real-time apps shoud mlockall() and not do anything that
can result in memory allocations in their fast (deterministic) paths.

The much more important case is desktop usage - that is where we run non
real-time code, but do expect 'low' latency due to user-interaction.

>From hitting swap on my 512M laptop (rather frequent occurance) I know
we can do better here,..

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/