Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched: enable interrupts and drop rq-lock duringnewidle balancing

[Steven Rostedt]

On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Gregory Haskins wrote:

>
> We do find_busiest_groups() et. al. without locks held for normal balancing,
> so lets do it for newidle as well.  It will allow other cpus to make
> forward progress (against our RQ) while we try to balance and allow
> some interrupts to occur.
>

I don't see anything wrong with this patch. I'll probably queue it up for
-rt8 since it is too late for -rt7.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/